It is not because somebody, even a US president-elect, declared not to believe in the human cause of global warming that one should believe that the decarbonation party is over.

Two concerns.

First, someone who does not seem to understand much of the matter cannot be a good ally. If his opposition to the climatic activism is just linked to an alleged plot (a Chinese one, we don’t understand why), or with the finances of the Coal-Oil and Gas industry, then it will be easy to make to him turn over his jacket (so we say in French) by explaining to him the advantages that he could pull from the Causa climatica.

If it’s his opposition to foreign judges, such as planned in the Paris agreement, then he rightly understood that, beyond climate, it is about a Horse of Troyes of the crawling universalism.

But as long as he will not have integrated an argumentation falsifying the anthropological principle of all climatic disorders (sic), then I will remain doubtful.

Formally, I don’t know if the signature of the president to ratify the agreement of Paris is sufficient. The US congress was not consulted. There could be a legal flaw which the new administration could want to correct to invalidate this ratification.

Then the rest of the world and the other half of the U. S. of A.

The spite which we hear towards this UFO is significant of the totalitarian spirit of the so-called democrats believing to have to commit themselves to an ideal, and to conduct a missionary action.

Personal precision: the good news is that Hillary was not elected; the bad is that Trump was. I did not envy the American voters and I shall have voted for none of both. But now, as the cards have been distributed, it is necessary to make do with this new situation.

I remember the comments which followed the election of Ronald Reagan. They were very similar: the slobs had elected him and he was only an idiotic and dangerous dilettante. Nine years later fell the Berlin Wall, then followed the collapse of the USSR. These comments were more than aggressive, heinous, and now it begins all over again.

Barack Obama quickly understood that it was necessary to pay attention to avoid instigating any flame, and his first statements about the transition are to be greeted, well done!

This hatred risks well to extend to all the circles which claim to be the intellectuals of the Earth; it is always blind and destructive, however good the intentions may have been.

In conclusion: if something will get heated, it will not have to do with the climate.  And the self-righteous eco-climatic dogma did not die, on the contrary it may get louder, but as the song of the swan, I hope.