In Switzerland, a petition to the government and to the members of Parliament for a fair climatic policy was launched so that everything should be undertaken to stop global warming[1]. The WWF is its main inspirator. Neither the authors nor the date of first publication are known. More than thirty thousand anonymous have already made a click to support it. I just have “signed” it by announcing me as Saint Augustin and I repeated it with the same e-mail address, this time under the name of Faust Méphisophélès.

A critical analysis of this text is given in this downloadable pdf document (in French).

The anthropogenic nature of the global warming is not even argued: it takes place, therefore Homos sapiens sapiens is the culprit.

No need for comments on the moving mountains in Switzerland, proof of the change; this is worth a prize for climathon. Nor of the sanctification promised to federal Councillor Leuthard if she commits herself resolutely in this crusade. Doris, Santa subita!

A new notion of climatic justice is introduced there, without indicating which laws or principles should apply, except that the poor people are once again more victims of the rich. Thus, Switzerland should radically reform the way she consumes energy. And it is asserted that 100 % renewable technologies being available, then they just have to be immediately implemented in order to have substituted everything within the next 35 years.

All this would only be normal and very conventional if the organizations which support this petition limited themselves to the socialist party, to the greens, to the unions (what are they doing here?), and to ecologist organizations. The most surprising and scandalous for me is that the large aid institutions of Christian obedience are joining this band wagon.

Do they know what they countersign and support? Did they ask themselves the question of the admissibility of the anthropogenic hypothesis of the global warming? Do they know if climatic variations are going to generate disadvantages or advantages for those whom they would like to help? Do they know that they join pseudo-moral injunctions which they would be ashamed to utter on other subjects?

But what revolts me most it is the diversion from much more urgent and important priorities for the development of countries in need[2]. Green-totalitarianism is on its way of winning its coup d’état and cannot care less about the needs of people, only Nature is worth being protected.

Are these honourable institutions naïve, or is it a cathartic desire to save the planet which motivates them? In the meantime, and as said one person whom they cherish: “forgive them; for they know not what they do.”

 

This post is also published on my site on the climate: climate.mr-int.ch

[1] www.klima-allianz.ch/fr/

[2] See my analysis on this subject: http://climate.mr-int.ch/index.php/en/development-3

Merci de partager et de diffuser cet article !