The US EPA decided a few years ago to name carbon dioxide a pollutant.
This means that such substance is detrimental to the environment, to life.
Is it actually the case for CO2?
We all know that it is not. But it’s nice also to see some demonstration of its positive impact on biomass.
Having seen it makes it more understandable.
Why is EPA making such foolishness?
Because they have a mandate to regulate pollutants, if carbon dioxide wasn’t one, they could not act on it.
This is then doublefoolish: scientifically, and bureaucratically.
Thanks to www.co2science.org for bringing up such informatiion.
Merci de partager et de diffuser cet article !
