Those who question climate alarmism and its anthropogenic basis find themselves labelled as denialists, however nuanced their remarks may be. This terminology is problematic because it draws an implicit comparison with historical denialism, which stifles any yet necessary debate.

McKinsey helps WEF Davos rethink decarbonisation
Even if there are reservations about McKinsey, the global strategic advisor, it must be acknowledged that it is a rich source of information and analysis. In its role as a substantial supporter of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Read more

The US empire more ferocious than ever
The Americanophilia that was cultivated after the Second World War lived on… as long as the world was simple, to the extent of opposing only two blocs: the free and democratic, and the totalitarian Soviet. Each accused the other Read more

COP29: the congress had no fun in Baku
At the end of an unbearable suspense, the tens of thousands of useless climate activists gathered in Baku managed to produce three documents that are difficult to read for the layperson in me.
It was the hagglers in particular Read more

Latest climate scoop: “scientists” advocate a double emergency
Once again, we must unearth a study whose aim is to reinforce the climate cause and its urgency. It has just been published (1) in Nature, one leading scientific journal. It shows that, now that it has finally been Read more

The frightening power of the carbon budget
In response to a climate threat attributed to human activity, the 2015 Paris Agreement stipulates that ongoing warming should not exceed 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Attributing the main cause to concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere, only Read more