The US EPA decided a few years ago to name carbon dioxide a pollutant. This means that such substance is detrimental to the environment, to life.
Is it actually the case for CO2? We all know that it is not. But it’s nice also to see some demonstration of its positive impact on biomass.
Having seen it makes it more understandable.
Why is EPA making such foolishness? Because they have a mandate to regulate pollutants, if carbon dioxide wasn’t one, they could not act on it. This is then doublefoolish: scientifically, and bureaucratically.
Thanks to www.co2science.org for bringing up such informatiion.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Oui, ajoutez-moi à votre liste de diffusion.
Post Comment
Δ
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
